75% of readers are more likely to trust the information presented in an article with annotations. Articles with annotations have a 60% higher chance of being cited by other authors. 95% of readers believe that article annotations improve their reading experience. Articles with annotations have a 40% higher chance of ranking on the first page of search engine results. 70% of readers are more likely to remember the main points of an article if it has annotations. Articles with annotations receive 3 times more engagement than those without. 90% of readers find article annotations helpful in deciding whether to read the full article. Articles with annotations have a 50% higher chance of being shared on social media. 80% of readers prefer articles with annotations. Article annotations help readers understand the main points and key arguments of an article. ![]() Here are 10 important statistics about article annotations: There may be more than one answer for each phrase you see in bold.By Asim Akhtar (CEO) 10 Proven Steps: How to Write an Article Annotation - Ultimate Guide 2024 Try to match each phrase in bold font with one of the seven annotation elements listed on the front of this handout. Copeland, Health Commissioner of New York City, supports the idea that there was great concern in keeping the public confident that the matter was under control – even when the worst of the pandemic was hitting America.ĪCTIVITY: Look at the text in bold in the annotation above. In the second paragraph, there is evidence that Army doctors reporting this information have an interest in consoling the American public from “undue alarm.” This comment by Dr. The article, it turns out, was not accurate, as no immunization against the flu was ever found. This would have been spectacular news at this point in time. As a NYT’s article, it was written for the public at a basic reading level, and accounts for the development of immunization against the Spanish Flu. It is a basic, unbiased report of information the author received from the U.S. This primary source article was written at the time of the 1918 flu outbreak by a New York Times journalist. ![]() ProQuest Historical News York Times (1851-2003). ![]() Annotation of “Tells of Vaccine to Stop Influenza.” New York Times.Annotations are also written in 3rd person. You shouldn’t feel like you need to add “filler” information, especially if you cover all the annotation elements listed above. Because annotations are usually just a paragraph long, they need to be very succinct and to the point. Annotations are short - not over 150 words.If there are indexes, statistical tables, pictures, or a bibliography, your reader will want to know. If the work is long enough (a book or extensive article) you may want to briefly explain how it is organized. Conclusions, findings, results: What is your basic assessment of the article based on everything else you know?.Relationship of the work to other works in the field: Compared to other things you have read about the topic, what does this particular source add to your knowledge? Why is it worthy of inclusion into your project? What purpose does it serve? (This means you have to have already read a number of other materials on the topic before you can accurately annotate something.).Bias or standpoint of the author in relation to his theme: Does the author have a particular axe to grind, point to make, or something to sell (even if it is an idea)? What does the author have to gain or lose?.Audience and level of reading difficulty: For whom is the article written? Does the author use simple language? Scientific language? A particular jargon or specialized terms?. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |